We present the first upper bound on the convergence time to consensus of the well-known $h$-majority dynamics with $k$ opinions, in the synchronous setting, for $h$ and $k$ that are both non-constant values. We suppose that, at the beginning of the process, there is some initial additive bias towards some plurality opinion, that is, there is an opinion that is supported by $x$ nodes while any other opinion is supported by strictly fewer nodes. We prove that, with high probability, if the bias is $ω(\sqrt{x})$ and the initial plurality opinion is supported by at least $x = ω(\log n)$ nodes, then the process converges to plurality consensus in $O(\log n)$ rounds whenever $h = ω(n \log n / x)$. A main corollary is the following: if $k = o(n / \log n)$ and the process starts from an almost-balanced configuration with an initial bias of magnitude $ω(\sqrt{n/k})$ towards the initial plurality opinion, then any function $h = ω(k \log n)$ suffices to guarantee convergence to consensus in $O(\log n)$ rounds, with high probability. Our upper bound shows that the lower bound of $Ω(k / h^2)$ rounds to reach consensus given by Becchetti et al. (2017) cannot be pushed further than $\widetildeΩ(k / h)$. Moreover, the bias we require is asymptotically smaller than the $Ω(\sqrt{n\log n})$ bias that guarantees plurality consensus in the $3$-majority dynamics: in our case, the required bias is at most any (arbitrarily small) function in $ω(\sqrt{x})$ for any value of $k \ge 2$.

Last month, the British television network Channel 4 broadcast an "alternative Christmas address" by Queen Elizabeth II, in which the 94-year-old monarch was shown cracking jokes and performing a dance popular on TikTok. Of course, it wasn't real: The video was produced as a warning about deepfakes--apparently real images or videos that show people doing or saying things they never did or said. If an image of a person can be found, new technologies using artificial intelligence and machine learning now make it possible to show that person doing almost anything at all. The dangers of the technology are clear: A high-school teacher could be shown in a compromising situation with a student, a neighbor could be depicted as a terrorist. Can deepfakes, as such, be prohibited under American law?